Turn experimental steps into a research workflow diagram. Describe the order, branches and readouts below, then inspect a visual draft before sharing it.
01 / Your starting point
0 / 3000
Up to 1 free generation trial per browser, with no daily refill. Sign in to save your result; downloading new artwork requires paid access.
Paid access unlocks watermark-free downloads for retained originals and journal-sized exports.
02 / Your visual draft
Sample image
Your generated figure will replace this example while your abstract and output choices stay in place.
Review every scientific relationship and label, then check your target journal’s current AI-image policy.

Review of this result: the five stages, two branches and final join are present. The model also added a chart icon despite the instruction not to draw charts. It contains no measured data; remove it if it could imply a result.
Draw a scientific flowchart for a fictional cell experiment. Use five labeled stages: 1. Prepare cells. 2. Split into two groups. Branch into Control and Treatment. 3. Incubate both groups. 4. Measure fluorescence in both groups. 5. Compare the measurements. Show arrows in that order and make the two groups rejoin at Compare. Keep the group labels separate. Do not invent sample sizes, numerical results, charts or conclusions. Use a clear left-to-right workflow with short English labels.
Start with the material or sample, then list preparation, intervention, measurement and analysis. An experimental workflow diagram explains the procedure; it should not invent results.
Say which step splits into control and treatment groups, what differs between groups, and where the paths rejoin. Include real counts only when you can verify them.
A study design overview needs fewer stages than a lab protocol. Use short labels, specify a reading direction and keep the first draft focused on one process.